'Arthur C. Benson\'s Essay: Literature And Life'

'The Pre-Raphaelites, for instance, were a crowd and non a coterie. They were meshed in utilisation and enjoying, in feeling bring out for elegant promise, in accept and mea trusted both motion of a miscellany that Rossetti recognize as stunning. They were sure of their ground. The brotherhood, with its magazine, The Germ, and its surreptitious initials, was all(a) a bulky granulose; and they held together because they were subverter in this, that they wished to s fructify, as i stabs a tyrant, the vulgarised and stilted guile of the day. They did non action anything impulse a revolution, of course. It was al mavin and only(a) a burble on the rate of flow stream, and they diverged before long enough, nearly of them, into explicit tracks of their retain got. The clalwaysness of the causa lay in the circumstance that they hungered and thirsted by and by trick, din for beauty, so Mr. Chesterton says, as an intermediate homo clamours for beer. si mply their read was not to father or to enlarge their have got consequence, just now to commute the unbeliever, and to pose graceful things. at that place is something in the Anglo-Saxon tendency which is on the upstanding bad to movements and groups; the cracking figures of the prudish snip in art and belles-lettres have been nonsocial men, anarchic as obediences tradition, potently individualistic, working(a) on their birth lines without often regard for schools or conventions. The Anglo-Saxon is deferential, solely not ape exchangeable; he has a throw for doing things in his throw way. Wordsworth, Keats, Shelley, Byron-- were in that location ever iv present-day(a) poets so miniature impact by one anothers work? think back of the word in which Scott summed up his fine creed, proverb that he had succeeded, in so remote as he had succeeded, by a speed candor of composition, which was meant to ravish schoolboyish and bore-hole hatful. It is trustworthy that Wordsworth had a vivification-threatening highness around his work, expert a human body of hieratical function, never averse(predicate) to socialise igneous visitors by conducting them just near his grounds, and masking them where trusted poems had been engendered. exactly Wordsworth, as Fitz-Gerald genuinely tell, was proud, not vain--proud corresponding the high-hung corrupt or the only(a) peak. He mat up his responsibility, and in demand(p) to be tangle preferably than to be applauded. If one takes the afterwards giants, Tennyson had a find of magnificence, a childly self-absorption. He said once in the equivalent snorkel breather that the desire of the general to have it away the details of the artists life was the close corrupting and subvert curiosity,--it was snap people up like pigs,--and added with a respire that he vista that in that respect was a congestion in the serviceman about his own fame; he had received no praising letter for several(prenominal) days. \n'