The Crucible

The Crucible          many an(prenominal) authors take advantage of their outstanding minute abilities to convey their personal beliefs to the world. Arthur moth miller is a prime ingest of a crafty fulfillwright who divulges hidden messages through drama. Millers inner psyche was molded by the poor quantify of the Great Depression, which forced his family into bankruptcy, and proved the instability of moderne universe to him. Though the setting occurs during the Salem witchcraft trials, Millers play The Crucible, was genuinely directed towards the then prevalent congressional investigation of profligate activities in the United States. There are umpteen similarities between the personalities of the characters in The Crucible and the personality of Arthur Miller.         There was a halt in time where the House Un-American Activities Committee, puff by Senator Joseph R. McCarthy, was investigating and questioning individuals around th eir alleged commie ideologies. Many of Millers associates were compelled to give into to the persuasive pressures of the Committee. Those who refused to support with the bustling interrogations found themselves excommunicated and their line of achievements ruined. Miller himself was called before the committee, but he desisted from giving names of people he knew were involved in Communist movements. He was taken into custody for being unpatriotic, and his course languished for a long time thereafter. He wrote The Crucible as a response to his experience in the McCarthy hearings. John Proctor, the wiz of The Crucible, is comparable to Arthur Miller because he, too, was put into the painful situation in which he had the opportunity to clear his name but did non because he risked framing others. Similar to Arthur Miller, Proctor remained loyal to his colleagues: How whitethorn I teach [my children] to walk like men in the world, and I sold my friends? (143). Miller is express ing through Proctor the brilliance of not b! etraying others to saves ones own skin.

When Proctor is commanded to present against some other man in court he responds: I handle my own sins; I cannot judge another (141).         An evoke lesson about human tendencies can be learned from the characters in The Crucible. It is human nature to place blame upon soul elses shoulders preferably of accepting the guilt upon oneself. Throughout the story, whenever it came to the situation that someone was singled out, their counterbalance instinct was to point a finger at the other person. John Proctor, despite a history of lechery and seeming spec tral rebellion, was among the noble few who refused to evade guilt by refocus the accusations towards someone else. Thus, one can learn a rich lesson from the humble, honest farmer who took responsibility for his actions. If you want to stand by a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper